From Midwest Chick, https://midwestchick.com/
September 30, 2025
Demonstrating the consequences of school board policies
ht: B
A mother in California decided that, after months of speaking to her local school board about allowing boys into girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms (and getting nowhere), that she was show them.
So she started to strip at the podium (she was wearing a bathing suit).
‘I wanted to give them more of a visual, what does it really look like changing and what would it feel like [to have] somebody of the opposite sex watching you change.’
Bourne said she now feels she got her point across.
‘If the adults don’t feel comfortable watching someone – and I’m a 50-year-old woman – how can they expect girls to feel comfortable doing that in the locker room?’ she asked, rhetorically.
‘The more open dialogue, open debate we can have on topics that are controversial, I think, we are going to end up having a safer society,’ she added.
Of course the school board had her hauled out and charged with disturbing the peace.
Their reaction was not unlike the school boards where parents read from books allowed in public school libraries. They were silenced due to the content.
A Georgia school board member cut off a mother reading sexually explicit content from a book available to high school students in the district, saying the passage was “inappropriate” for any children to potentially hear.
“Excuse me, we have children at home,” Cherokee County school board member identified as Patsy Jordan told the angry mother after she read a sexually-charged passage from the book “Homegoing.” The school board member pointed out that the meeting was being livestreamed and said reading the passage was “inappropriate.”
“Don’t you find the irony in that?” the parent responded. “You’re exactly saying exactly what I’m telling you! You’re giving it to our children! I would never give this to my children!”
But the boards can’t stand to actually have the consequences of their policies shown to them. So they use the force of law to remove the people holding up the mirror to them.
Posted by:
Midwest Chick
A comment excerpt from MDWC’s comment section that holds an important tool:
steves6, “Money talks. Go after their bonds. Whole ‘nother ballgame and rules.”
Yes, all you really have to do is accuse them of illegal behaviour and their insurance will usually place them on immediate administrative leave pending a hearing.
Be the sand in the cogs. Carry on.
It’d be outstanding if this approach actually yielded results. That said, I’m surprised it hasn’t already seen traction, if it is highly effective.
The vast majority of people don’t have any idea of said bonds.
I’m familiar with bonding. I just wasn’t aware it was that easy to have a professional Bond revoked. The thing is, what legitimate accusation would one level against a bonded individual, in this case a school board member (and are all school board members even required to be bonded?) that would actually have a solid shot of causing it to be revoked, thereby professionally neutering said individual?
It’s not used much because it rarely works. The municipalities pay the fees. If they say anything against the administrators, no more fees, and the problem people just go with a different agency. The only time a bond company will do crap is when all the legal ducks are in a row, including a bought & paid for DA/judge, and they know 100% they’ll lose big in court. Only then do they cut their loses.
I hate to sound defeatist, but that’s kind of what I figured. If there were an easy solution, it would already have been taken.
I have not heard of this happening / working in my area.
Given that it is a form of lawfare, I would think that leftards would have already been pounding any conservative administrators with this exploit, going back years.
Haven’t seen that at all, thankfully.
No, NO leftist school board can see the irony in it because they are ALL braindead stubfarts.
Send them to Africa or China
Time.to.deport US citizens who have no brain.
I’m a notary, and that requires a bond. Teachers, and all school administrators, should have the same requirement. It prevents economic problems for actions that need correcting, and when someone that requires a bond is a problem, bonds become unavailable, or very expensive.