Well, you still are naked under all them clothes, unless, of course, you are sun bathng alfresco
…but is pornography nudity?
Pornography doesn’t even have to involve people.
Well, it appears AI will see to that, soon enough. Whatever will all the OF hoes do for money then?
All I see is a young woman angling for attention via titillation. . Imagine that.
She would go broke on onlyfans.
I don’t know. The bar is incredibly low for a lot of simps these days.
…It can be if done correctly.
Depends on intent. But FREEDOM demands that anyone and everyone is free to expose themselves both as subject and as viewer of whatever the hell they want, so long as they are not party to the violation of the rights/person/property of another.
Social morals are also a thing.
Deal with young kids who’ve sexted and then had their picture circulated by the one they thought they loved and trusted. These kids are no longer slightly embarrassed but have their pictures widely circulated. One of the many factors leading to an increase in suicide by the young.
It is not harmless.
Teaching girls to get attention by being Ho’s instead of a good wife and mother is how societies quit procreating and die, and ugly and deserved death.
What you want to believe is not supported by the facts.
Societies do not work if there is not some mutual obligation towards one another, including an agreement on how we teach and protect our kids.
Methinks that since the etymology of porn derives from imagery of sexual acts and/or selling oneself to another in exchange for conducting sexual acts, that nudity which displays the human body for its own beauty cannot be porn. Sure, there’s always cows out there who’ll push up against the mental fence just to see how far they can blur the lines, but isn’t that some level of freedom also?
I think most men would make a distinction between “tasteful” artistic nudity, and porn, the latter of which is explicitly sexual by definition.
I think many women would disagree, because defining it all as “porn” makes it easier to shame men into not looking at it, since women don’t like having to compete with someone younger, hotter, tighter and lighter than themselves. So of course, they’d want to make the admiration of simple nudes (of beautiful women) a “bad thing”.
Would Agree. Wife Unit might not. But that is a tale for another day.
If nudity is porn then a whole lot of the fine art, paintings, drawings and sculptures, of the last 3000 years is porn. I think not.
I’ve been a nudist for over 50 years and one thing I thankfully learned at a young age is that most people confuse nudity and sexualty.
TMI dude…
Ha, yeah. I’ve never been a nudist, and at over 50 now, nobody wants to see the full glory of Big Ruckus completely naked. And that suits me fine, because I don’t care to show it off.
The cool thing about nudity, I’ve found, is that you drop more than your linen. You’re just another person with no agenda to control someone else.
Everyone I’ve met that wore clothes, were controlling and clothes are used as a prop.
Speaking only for myself, I don’t use clothes as a pretension. I’m a plumber, and the only time I ever dress “fancy” is out for respect, when attending a wedding or a funeral, and maybe for Christmas and Easter dinner.
Clothing is practical, it keeps me warm in winter, helps protect me against sunburn in the summer, keeps insects off most of my body in the spring to early fall, and spares others from having to see the less flattering portions of my physique. Plus it gives me places to carry my keys and wallet, a screwdriver and pliers. Why would I dispense with the convenience it clothing affords me?
I LOVE NUDITY … only of the biological female type. Don’t care for porn.
I can respect that take. Besides, porn is an instrument of jewish subversive perverts to fuck with the minds of those who consume it. And far too many do these days, to the great detriment of society.
If it wasn’t for porn, I never would have found out about the internet….haha
If it wasn’t for the internet, I probably wouldn’t have found out about porn (as it is defined nowadays). Sure, I saw the occasional magazine when I was in high school, but the level of absolute degenerate filth that is accessible now simply didn’t exist back then, unless you knew someone who had a collection of videotapes, or satellite tv. I don’t mess with the filth online now, but have periodically had guys I worked with show me something on their phone, and I’m sure I’ve not even seen the most shocking stuff available in that context. So no, I’m not naieve about it, but I don’t seek it out.
I will say this, I’ve seen enough via unintended exposure to shatter any illusions I had about women being the sweet, fairer sex. This stuff wouldn’t exist without their willing cooperating in making it, and from that I can ascertain that (a lot of) bitches be nasty.
I was like almost EVERY male in high school and if someone had a nudie magazine, hell yes, I looked. But from what I remember, those were 99% nudity and very, very little of what I call porn. I will scroll through those collections of nudie girls that people post on web sites, but I won’t go to what I refer to as porn. That shit will ruin your vision of women the way I want to think of, remember, them.
Women, especially Leftist Feminist women and gold digging bitches do a pretty good job of ruining men’s vision of them all by their lonesome, without the help of porn.
Among the many things I’ve done in this life is artwork, having had displays in art schools, galleries, and museums.
If it were the same, the same word would be used.
My mom told me I was born naked.
Well, you still are naked under all them clothes, unless, of course, you are sun bathng alfresco
…but is pornography nudity?
Pornography doesn’t even have to involve people.
Well, it appears AI will see to that, soon enough. Whatever will all the OF hoes do for money then?
All I see is a young woman angling for attention via titillation. . Imagine that.
She would go broke on onlyfans.
I don’t know. The bar is incredibly low for a lot of simps these days.
…It can be if done correctly.
Depends on intent. But FREEDOM demands that anyone and everyone is free to expose themselves both as subject and as viewer of whatever the hell they want, so long as they are not party to the violation of the rights/person/property of another.
Social morals are also a thing.
Deal with young kids who’ve sexted and then had their picture circulated by the one they thought they loved and trusted. These kids are no longer slightly embarrassed but have their pictures widely circulated. One of the many factors leading to an increase in suicide by the young.
It is not harmless.
Teaching girls to get attention by being Ho’s instead of a good wife and mother is how societies quit procreating and die, and ugly and deserved death.
What you want to believe is not supported by the facts.
Societies do not work if there is not some mutual obligation towards one another, including an agreement on how we teach and protect our kids.
Methinks that since the etymology of porn derives from imagery of sexual acts and/or selling oneself to another in exchange for conducting sexual acts, that nudity which displays the human body for its own beauty cannot be porn. Sure, there’s always cows out there who’ll push up against the mental fence just to see how far they can blur the lines, but isn’t that some level of freedom also?
I think most men would make a distinction between “tasteful” artistic nudity, and porn, the latter of which is explicitly sexual by definition.
I think many women would disagree, because defining it all as “porn” makes it easier to shame men into not looking at it, since women don’t like having to compete with someone younger, hotter, tighter and lighter than themselves. So of course, they’d want to make the admiration of simple nudes (of beautiful women) a “bad thing”.
Would Agree. Wife Unit might not. But that is a tale for another day.
If nudity is porn then a whole lot of the fine art, paintings, drawings and sculptures, of the last 3000 years is porn. I think not.
I’ve been a nudist for over 50 years and one thing I thankfully learned at a young age is that most people confuse nudity and sexualty.
TMI dude…
Ha, yeah. I’ve never been a nudist, and at over 50 now, nobody wants to see the full glory of Big Ruckus completely naked. And that suits me fine, because I don’t care to show it off.
The cool thing about nudity, I’ve found, is that you drop more than your linen. You’re just another person with no agenda to control someone else.
Everyone I’ve met that wore clothes, were controlling and clothes are used as a prop.
Speaking only for myself, I don’t use clothes as a pretension. I’m a plumber, and the only time I ever dress “fancy” is out for respect, when attending a wedding or a funeral, and maybe for Christmas and Easter dinner.
Clothing is practical, it keeps me warm in winter, helps protect me against sunburn in the summer, keeps insects off most of my body in the spring to early fall, and spares others from having to see the less flattering portions of my physique. Plus it gives me places to carry my keys and wallet, a screwdriver and pliers. Why would I dispense with the convenience it clothing affords me?
I LOVE NUDITY … only of the biological female type. Don’t care for porn.
I can respect that take. Besides, porn is an instrument of jewish subversive perverts to fuck with the minds of those who consume it. And far too many do these days, to the great detriment of society.
If it wasn’t for porn, I never would have found out about the internet….haha
If it wasn’t for the internet, I probably wouldn’t have found out about porn (as it is defined nowadays). Sure, I saw the occasional magazine when I was in high school, but the level of absolute degenerate filth that is accessible now simply didn’t exist back then, unless you knew someone who had a collection of videotapes, or satellite tv. I don’t mess with the filth online now, but have periodically had guys I worked with show me something on their phone, and I’m sure I’ve not even seen the most shocking stuff available in that context. So no, I’m not naieve about it, but I don’t seek it out.
I will say this, I’ve seen enough via unintended exposure to shatter any illusions I had about women being the sweet, fairer sex. This stuff wouldn’t exist without their willing cooperating in making it, and from that I can ascertain that (a lot of) bitches be nasty.
I was like almost EVERY male in high school and if someone had a nudie magazine, hell yes, I looked. But from what I remember, those were 99% nudity and very, very little of what I call porn. I will scroll through those collections of nudie girls that people post on web sites, but I won’t go to what I refer to as porn. That shit will ruin your vision of women the way I want to think of, remember, them.
Women, especially Leftist Feminist women and gold digging bitches do a pretty good job of ruining men’s vision of them all by their lonesome, without the help of porn.
Among the many things I’ve done in this life is artwork, having had displays in art schools, galleries, and museums.
No. Nudity is not porn.
Obligatory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOgd9hitEAE (I don’t look good naked anymore)
As a SCOTUS justice once said a long time ago “I may not be able to define pornography but I know it when I see it”.
I don’t know about porn but I was a hit at the local nudist colony because I could carry a dozen doughnuts and 2 cups of coffee using only 2 hands.
Neck
I’d hit that…
me too