Actually, either word IS proper. Regardless or irregardless. Either can be used. I always thought irregardless was wrong, but it is not. I was saddened when I found out.
Correct but it is used improperly in most cases.
Hey, no one axed you.
Ain’t nobody ax me, dammit.
I felt the same way about “flammable” and “inflammable”.
That, saying ‘axe’ when the work is spelled a-s-k….
Actually, either word IS proper. Regardless or irregardless. Either can be used. I always thought irregardless was wrong, but it is not. I was saddened when I found out.
Correct but it is used improperly in most cases.
Hey, no one axed you.
Ain’t nobody ax me, dammit.
I felt the same way about “flammable” and “inflammable”.
That, saying ‘axe’ when the work is spelled a-s-k….
Going to the liberry to look that up.
…………..busketti, sammich
…And “nucular…”
Pacific instead of specific
MY all time favorite is loose/lose.
Add “couldunt” and “wouldunt”.
I didduhnt say that