data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14da8/14da8b1ea6256ce73fce6dbe7ef15d5239265d1e" alt=""
Oderint dum metuant
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14da8/14da8b1ea6256ce73fce6dbe7ef15d5239265d1e" alt=""
Your Power to Trespass
By KrisAnne Hall, JD
If a government agent or assignee comes to your property, it will be important to those who wish to protect their privacy and property to KNOW THEIR RIGHTS.
Liberty First Legal, Inc. 7/7/2021 https://libertyfirst.legal/
YOU ARE BEING ISSUED A TRESPASS WARNING. ANY FURTHER ENTRY OF THIS PROPERTY WILL BE SUBJECT TO ARREST.
Address of Property:____________________________________
Date and Time of Trespass: _______________________________
Owner/Lessee of Property: _______________________________
I have taken a photograph of you to show to a Deputy or Peace Officer to prove delivery of this Notice of Trespass.
NOTICE TO THE TRESPASSER
Trespass is a general intent crime that usually requires no evidence that the defendant intended to commit the offense. The mere act of willfully entering upon, remaining in, or returning to any property, or after being warned not to do so, is sufficient to establish guilt.
By State law it is a crime if the offender defies an order to leave; if the offender opens a door, fence, or gate.
Notice against trespassers may be provided by posting, fencing, cultivation, or actual communication (warning). See State Laws for the definitions of posting, fencing, cultivation, etc.
Warning may be given by the property owner or by a person authorized to do so by the property owner.
A warning may be in writing or may be verbal. A verbal warning by the property owner or his or her agent is sufficient to constitute warning against remaining in or reentry onto the property.
The inability to issue a written Trespass Warning to the subject does not prohibit a subsequent arrest for trespass if there is evidence through a sworn statement or other evidence to establish when the trespass warning was given and that it was given to the same subject. I have taken a picture of you, to establish evidence of my warning against returning to this property.
By State Law, an officer finding that a previously-warned subject has returned to the same property without an invitation to do so may arrest the subject for trespassing.
When a subject has been duly warned to leave or stay off the premises, even if those premises are a BUSINESS ESTABLISHEMENT, by law it is safe to assume that any invitation to enter was withdrawn. Any return by the subject, along with a complaint and proof of warning by the owner or agent, justifies a charge of Trespass.
THERE IS NO PERMITTED “FIRST AMENDMENT ACTIVITY” ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OF ANY SORT.
EVEN PERSONS ACTING AS AGENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT MAY BE TRESPASSED.
State and US Constitutions guarantee that every person is to be secure in their property from searches and seizures without a warrant based upon probable cause issued pursuant to the rules of due process. Agents of the government cannot simply enter private property based upon the color of law or a perceived need. The US Supreme Court, June 23, 2021, in CEDAR POINT NURSERY ET AL. v. HASSID ET AL. established that a law that allows agents of the government or even permits private citizens the authority to enter property without a warrant or invitation can amount to the taking of that property and is therefore contrary to the Constitution.
YOU HAVE BEEN DULY NOTIFIED- IF YOU RETURN TO THIS PROPERTY YOU WILL BE SUBJECT TO ARREST
Liberty First Legal, Inc. 7/7/2021 https://libertyfirst.legal/
https://lonestarparson.blogspot.com
Do you think, dear friends, that some kind of switch flipped and DJT was allowed to take power? That the Deep State is and was controlled by a deeper State? You know, they got fed up with green trans agitprop and the Zelensky fraud.
Just putting it out there, don’t say audit the Pentagon.
LSP
From Vox Day, https://www.voxday.net./
The truth that has been long denied. I am not an enthusiastic fan of Vox Day, but he brings a compelling argument and vast empirical evidence for it. The one main culprit that always is present, is vaccines. Like DDT, a commentator in my last post stated: “God knows we’ve done a number on ourselves with too much bullshit chemistry.”
You have to either be prodigiously stupid, willfully blind, totally corrupt, or some combination of the three to still deny that vaccines are the cause of autism, which they quite obviously are.
When Elaine C. was seven years old, her parents became so worried about her speech that they approached a psychiatrist.
The little girl could talk. She just couldn’t say anything meaningful. Instead of asking questions or chattering to her parents, Elaine simply repeated bizarre phrases: ‘Dinosaurs don’t cry… Needle head… Seals and salamanders.’
The psychiatrist who studied Elaine, Dr Leo Kanner, was born in Austria but lived on America’s east coast. After three weeks of observations, he informed her parents that their daughter was suffering from an extremely rare condition – so rare that in five years of intensive research, from New York to Boston, he had been able to discover only ten other cases.
Dr Kanner coined a word for this condition: he called it autism.
That was the mid-1940s. Today, a psychiatrist could go into virtually any school in Britain or the US and find at least ten children with autism. Some would have learning difficulties as profound as Elaine’s or more debilitating. Others could show a variety of less obvious developmental delays…
In the UK, the first cases began to be noticed in the 1950s, when they were classified under ‘childhood schizophrenia’. The first British doctor to use the term ‘autism’ was Mildred Creak, a psychiatrist at Great Ormond Street hospital, in 1963.
In other words, autism was unknown in Britain before the Beatles era.
If you’re still unconvinced that the condition has appeared and become widespread in the space of a human lifetime, think about this: in all of 19th-century literature, not a single child is described with autistic traits.
Charles Dickens had ten children. Leo Tolstoy had 13. Mary Elizabeth Braddon, who wrote dozens of sensation novels, had six of her own and five stepchildren. Those writers, like countless others of the time, were fascinated by psychological strangeness. But none of them depicted autism in their books – which can only mean they never saw it.
So, what has changed since 1940. Obviously, the childhood vaccine program, right? I mean, this is absolutely and entirely obvious, right?
Kennedy is a conspiracy theorist who has linked the epidemic of autism to vaccines. All the science indicates that he’s wrong. So does the timeline: vaccines have been around since the end of the 18th century, 150 years before the first cases of autism were identified. When Kennedy and his ilk make wild claims about what causes the condition, they make life much more difficult for millions of parents who are trying to get the care and education their autistic children need.
The retardery, it burns. Even when the totally fucking obvious is flashing right in front of his face in giant red lights, this moron retreats to the safety of the Narrative. Let’s point out the obvious errors.
The real reason parents are in such denial about vaccines causing autism is that they don’t want to believe it was their fault. That’s understandable; it’s no different than the people who want to believe they were “forced” to get the Covid-19 vaccination. But if you’re dumb enough to believe anything that the medical authorities tell you, you simply have to own that. Because while not doing so isn’t going to mitigate any of the consequences you’re going to face, at least you might be able to avoid making the same stupid mistake next time.
And there will be a next time.
10 Inefficiencies In Government Computer Systems Identified By DOGE Workers
Feb 6, 2025 · BabylonBee.com
The Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency has been on the warpath against federal waste and turning over every seedy rock to shed light on inefficiencies in our nation’s agencies and institutions. Government computer systems are no exception.
The Babylon Bee has obtained the following list of glaring inefficiencies found in government computer systems:
Fixing the inefficiencies listed above should make the federal government run like a well-oiled machine in no time.